Controlling the Black American Man
Many white Americans think that hate speech short of
explicitly inciting violence should be permissible as something allowable -
anywhere, anytime and in all circumstances - under the First Amendment's
protection of free speech.
With regard to race I think many whites who think this way
are giving support to the historical transition away from lynching and toward
non-violent measures that have a broader appeal among whites. Those being:
housing red-lining, Jim Crow laws, gerrymandering, voter suppression, hate
speech, white anger at black athlete protesters - all as means of maintaining
control of and supremacy over African Americans, especially black males.
Essentially, many whites have backed off violence and found
legal and moral cover under free speech and discriminative laws and practices.
The have thereby fortified their sense of justification and legitimization, and
been emboldened.
That real, debilitating harm continues to be inflicted by
these non-violent, legal yet immoral actions and speech is undeniable. This
essay supports this view.
Excerpts
"As a psychiatrist, I’ve long been interested in how
racial identity affects mental health, and the chronic stress that racial
minorities experience when they’re exposed to racist messages, particularly in
the media. In the controversy swirling around Kaepernick, I see racially
encoded messages about power, place and punishment of black people. Obviously,
there’s a difference between antebellum lynching and social media outrage. But
though the overt responses may have changed, the underlying hatred, disgust and
impulses to punish prominent, 'poorly behaved' black figures still remains.
Spanning back to America’s founding, there’s an entire history of blacks
stepping outside of the social order – or protesting it – only to be told they
can’t."
...
"As the number of lynchings decreased in the early 20th
century, the mechanisms of enforcing the boundaries of black identity were
reshaped. White majorities enforced social and civic confinement for most of
the African-American community through redlining,
voting restrictions and Jim Crow laws."
...
"Critics of black athletes often claim they have
'character' concerns – that
they’re bothered by arrogance or poor sportsmanship. But I wonder if the
same social and psychological processes that fueled the phenomenon of lynching
are the undercurrent of so much public disgust with Newton and
Kaepernick."
...
"Today no one can lynch a professional athlete, so the
pressure to conform must be exerted more subtly. In this way, old expressions
of racism are simply being recrafted and reshaped in modern, more socially
acceptable forms."
Comments
Post a Comment